
oldsmobile-digest     Saturday, February 28 2004     Volume 01 : Number 4797



Re: bop car show
Re: bop car show
Re: bop car show
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: Non FI 371 comes to life AGAIN!
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Laid off today
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
liquidating parts inventory
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
66 Cutlass rear 1/4 panels / sections available, hurry!
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
More 66 parts
Re: Non FI 371 comes to life AGAIN!
Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
free carfax til sunday!
More eBay fun-  Question for seller -- Item #2462917579
Re: Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight
Re: More eBay fun-  Question for seller -- Item #2462917579

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:48:55 -0600
From: James Aiello <ilo@kwom.com>
Subject: Re: bop car show

Mike,

Yep that was me, now I'm in North Aurora. Come by and say hello. I 
think I remember see or should
I say hear you going by on 59!

James


>
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:34:20 -0600
> From: "Michael Brady" <mbrady38@comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: bop car show
>
>> Also a BOPC show in Wheaton IL this March 28th!!
>> I'll have a table set up with a big Oldsmobile poster, and tons of 
>> parts
>> for convertibles and such! If you want a1970 350 olds engine and trans
>> let
>> me know and I'll bring it. $100! Also have a couple of 455s.
>> And some Pontiac parts too.
>>
>> stop by and say HI!
>>
>>
>> James Aiello
>> 1970 442
>> 1968 GTO
>> 1974 98
>
>
> Hello James,
>
> I will stop and say hello, going to have several friends with spaces up
> there and I have never talked to you before, you lived in Warrenville 
> for a
> while right??
>
> Michael Brady
> 1966 442

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:53:38 -0600
From: James Aiello <ilo@kwom.com>
Subject: Re: bop car show

Ron,

I have 3 of them, one is from a 1970 442 and is missing intake and 
water pump. but other wise is complete. Needs rings from what
I know. ran. 500
2nd one is from a 1974 98 and ran last year, no carb. 500obo
3rd one is from 1968 and has a E head and a J head, torker I and it ran 
10 years ago. That is all I know about this one. 350

James

> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:15:57 +0000
> From: 77w30442@comcast.net
> Subject: Re: bop car show
>
> in aprile around easter i am going to iowa to drop off my sons 1987 
> 442, how far are you off i80 and if you still have the 455 olds 
> engines what would you want for them
>  e mail me at
>  77w30442@comcast.net
> thanks
> ron

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:45:28 -0600
From: "Michael Brady" <mbrady38@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: bop car show

> Mike,
>
> Yep that was me, now I'm in North Aurora. Come by and say hello. I
> think I remember see or should
> I say hear you going by on 59!
>
> James

You got it James!! Yea....every time I would drive past I would look for
someone outside, of course whenever I was working or had to be somewhere I
would see you outside:-(

Uh-huh........a few of those Oldsmobiles were just a bit LOUD:-) especially
the 68' H/O........

My Tri-carb 66' makes some noise now as well:-)

See you at the BOP+C..........

Mike

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:12:22 -0700
From: Cliff Simpson <csimpson@ucalgary.ca>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

Tour Op & Travel Agency Trade 2000 wrote:
> Hi all,
> is the 455 much havier than the 260? I wander if the front will plow much or
> not in the 81CS 2dr when I install the big engine ( 1968 )?

Well as a real rough guess I'd say the 455 will be about 60 lbs heavier. 
  According to the FAQ the 455 weighs 620 lbs while the 350 is 560 lbs 
so ...

How about having someone light sit on the front bumper and see how much 
it droops :)

Also, does anyone know where the most recent FAQ is?  The one at 442.com 
is way old (says V 5.X LAST UPDATED 10/10/2000) while Mr. Brown's site 
is gone :(

Thanks,
- --

Cliff "I'm not on digest, I'm just slow." Simpson & Kermit
http://www.ucalgary.ca/~csimpson/TheOldsZone.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:20:43 -0300
From: "Tour Op & Travel Agency Trade 2000" <travelchile@manquehue.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

Thanks Cliff, I think that with those small bores there should be some more
iron in the block making the 260 potentially a heavy engine. I never saw the
wight numbers for this particuliar engine
rgds
Matt
> Well as a real rough guess I'd say the 455 will be about 60 lbs heavier.
>   According to the FAQ the 455 weighs 620 lbs while the 350 is 560 lbs
> so ...

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:40:34 -0800
From: Greg Tjosvold <tjosvold@polar7.com>
Subject: Re: Non FI 371 comes to life AGAIN!

Randy,

Congrats on getting her going!

'Best,

Greg

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:53:48 -0500
From: SteveH <k0xp@dandy.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At Friday, 27 February 2004, you wrote:

>Thanks Cliff, I think that with those small bores there should 
>be some more iron in the block making the 260 potentially a 
>heavy engine. I never saw the wight numbers for this particuliar 
>engine

Don't forget the 260 also had windered mains whereas the 455s didn't.

Never heard of anyone overboring a 260 so have no idea how thick 
the cylinder walls really are. I figger you'd hafta be either a strict 
restorationist or a masochist to want to rebuild a 260 anyhow  ;o\ 
Or else, you just enjoy having the sand kicked in yer eyes like 
the weakling on the beach  :o)))))))

SteveH



===================================================================
EASY access to your email http://webmail.dandy.net/mr2/nph-mr.cgi
===================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:25:24 -0600
From: "Reed, Stephen" <sreed@chatsworth.com>
Subject: Laid off today

All,
	I received notice today that I am being laid off from CPI.  Please forward all emails to my home address @ ssreed@direcway.com
	I have the option to work up to 4 additional weeks to finish a project I'm working on, but please send any emails to the home addy to contact me.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:10:41 -0300
From: "Tour Op & Travel Agency Trade 2000" <travelchile@manquehue.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

Steve, there will be soon a perfect 260ci on sale, you can take it and
experience the smooth and gentle acceleration of so equipped car... :-))
Now, between an evil idleing V6 (90degrees between banks )  or the truck
inline 6 and this brave V8 I chose the last one without any hesitation. I
must say, that this is my very first V8 running so smooth, not a single
vibration, no shaking, sounds much alike those BMW engines.... and with no
cat and a huge double exhaust it defends itself against other users of the
road with quite a good luck.
I guess, with a descent cam and somewhat bigger carb you could make about
150-160 HP SAE net... not much worse that the 4.3l V6 by Ch*vy and with the
V8 smoothness and aristocratic sound. This small engines revs high with
will...
Matt



> Never heard of anyone overboring a 260 so have no idea how thick
> the cylinder walls really are. I figger you'd hafta be either a strict
> restorationist or a masochist to want to rebuild a 260 anyhow  ;o\
> Or else, you just enjoy having the sand kicked in yer eyes like
> the weakling on the beach  :o)))))))

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:57:54 -0500
From: "swanny" <swannys78@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

I guess, with a descent cam and somewhat bigger carb you could make about
150-160 HP SAE net..

I had a 260 in my '80 Cutlass.......its not a 350 wanna be dreamer engine by
any means, but I can't say I had any complaints.  Just no  b*lls, but the
car's looks made up for that.....Just cuz it is a Cutlass......    :-)
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tour Op & Travel Agency Trade 2000" <travelchile@manquehue.net>
To: <oldsmobile@chebucto.ns.ca>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight


> Steve, there will be soon a perfect 260ci on sale, you can take it and
> experience the smooth and gentle acceleration of so equipped car... :-))
> Now, between an evil idleing V6 (90degrees between banks )  or the truck
> inline 6 and this brave V8 I chose the last one without any hesitation. I
> must say, that this is my very first V8 running so smooth, not a single
> vibration, no shaking, sounds much alike those BMW engines.... and with no
> cat and a huge double exhaust it defends itself against other users of the
> road with quite a good luck.
> I guess, with a descent cam and somewhat bigger carb you could make about
> 150-160 HP SAE net... not much worse that the 4.3l V6 by Ch*vy and with
the
> V8 smoothness and aristocratic sound. This small engines revs high with
> will...
> Matt
>
>
>
> > Never heard of anyone overboring a 260 so have no idea how thick
> > the cylinder walls really are. I figger you'd hafta be either a strict
> > restorationist or a masochist to want to rebuild a 260 anyhow  ;o\
> > Or else, you just enjoy having the sand kicked in yer eyes like
> > the weakling on the beach  :o)))))))
>
>

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:40:09 -0800 (PST)
From: chris smetana <grp442@yahoo.com>
Subject: liquidating parts inventory

- --0-338336691-1077921609=:48962
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Greetings,
Do to my current engine rebuild and health issues in the family, I need to unload as much stuff as I can.  The list I have is waaaay too long to put here, but includes many assorted 64-72 Olds/Cutlass items.  I'm more flexible on some things as opposed to others but more than willing to give a good deal on quantity purchases.  My website (url below) has a partial listing of what I have but off the top of my head I can also include 70 type O rear axle, from wrecked 47K mile rallye 350.  3.23 open.  65 wheel well moldings.  68-72 rear interior panels and armrests.  70-72 passenger post coupe door.  a pile of misc chrome like 68 front fender stainless, some misc 69 (now convert rear pieces though), 70-72 rocker chrome, 68-69 vinyl top chrome, 68-72 front windshield chrome, 68 wagon 'oldsmobile' tailgate chrome strip.  a couple sets of 69-72 buckets with rear seats.  pair of vista cruiser rear drums.  WS-6 front sway bar.  misc hubcaps (70-72 most likely).  72 455 with J heads that had a
 mild rebuild but needs gone through (approx 1500-2500 miles).  73 455, running, but burns some oil, mileage and internal condition unknown but it's currently sitting in my W-31.  69 Grand Prix TH400 tranny core.  71-72 Cutlass rear bumper core.  70-72 convert decklids.  68-69 wheel well mouldings.  rebuilt (or soon to be) 66-67 front control arms with all new MOOG parts and painted Eastwood Chassis black.  I believe a 7.5 G-body rear axle, gears unknown I just have it to keep a car rolling, from an 85 Cutlass w/buick v6.  69 dash plastic, black from a cutlass and red from a 442.  several floor shift non-tilt columns, 69-72 and one 67-68.  66 cutlass passenger fender, 67 cutlass supreme driver door.  old repro 70-72 rear spoiler.  70-72 holiday coupe trunk lid drilled for aftermarket spoiler.  the list goes on and on.  I even have a pair of #5 heads.  small block 2bbl intakes.  64-72 hardtop and 68-72 convertible tranny crossmembers.  69-70 front turn signal housings.  69 442 holiday
 coupe rear interior panels in red.  68-72 evaporator housing.  68-72 a/c heater core housing, interior side of firewall.  p/s setup from a 69 442 4sp with a/c.  everything is located in the southwest suburbs of Chicago.
 
Thanks,
Chris
grp442@yahoo.com
http://gloryrestoparts.20megsfree.com/


- ---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
- --0-338336691-1077921609=:48962
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>Greetings,</DIV>
<DIV>Do to my current engine rebuild and health issues in the family, I need to unload as much stuff as I can.&nbsp; The list I have is waaaay too long to put here, but includes many assorted 64-72 Olds/Cutlass items.&nbsp; I'm more flexible on some things as opposed to others but more than willing to give a good deal on quantity purchases.&nbsp; My website (url below) has a partial listing of what I have but off the top of my head I can also include 70 type O rear axle, from wrecked 47K mile rallye 350.&nbsp; 3.23 open.&nbsp; 65 wheel well moldings.&nbsp; 68-72 rear interior panels and armrests.&nbsp; 70-72 passenger post coupe door.&nbsp; a pile of misc chrome like 68 front fender stainless, some misc 69 (now convert rear pieces though), 70-72 rocker chrome, 68-69 vinyl top chrome, 68-72 front windshield chrome, 68 wagon 'oldsmobile' tailgate chrome strip.&nbsp; a couple sets of 69-72 buckets with rear seats.&nbsp; pair of vista cruiser rear drums.&nbsp; WS-6 front sway bar.&nbsp;
 misc hubcaps (70-72 most likely).&nbsp; 72 455 with J heads that had a mild rebuild but needs gone through (approx 1500-2500 miles).&nbsp; 73 455, running, but burns some oil, mileage and internal condition unknown but it's currently sitting in my W-31.&nbsp; 69 Grand Prix TH400 tranny core.&nbsp; 71-72 Cutlass rear bumper core.&nbsp; 70-72 convert decklids.&nbsp; 68-69 wheel well mouldings.&nbsp; rebuilt (or soon to be) 66-67 front control arms with all new MOOG parts and painted Eastwood Chassis black.&nbsp; I believe a 7.5 G-body rear axle, gears unknown I just have it to keep a car rolling, from an 85 Cutlass w/buick v6.&nbsp; 69 dash plastic, black from a cutlass and red from a 442.&nbsp; several floor shift non-tilt columns, 69-72 and one 67-68.&nbsp; 66 cutlass passenger fender, 67 cutlass supreme driver door.&nbsp; old repro 70-72 rear spoiler.&nbsp; 70-72 holiday coupe trunk lid drilled for aftermarket spoiler.&nbsp; the list goes on and on.&nbsp; I even have a pair of #5
 heads. &nbsp;small block 2bbl intakes.&nbsp; 64-72 hardtop and 68-72 convertible tranny crossmembers.&nbsp; 69-70 front turn signal housings.&nbsp; 69 442 holiday coupe rear interior panels in red.&nbsp; 68-72 evaporator housing.&nbsp; 68-72 a/c heater core housing, interior side of firewall.&nbsp; p/s setup from a 69 442 4sp with a/c.&nbsp; everything is located in the southwest suburbs of Chicago.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>Chris</DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:grp442@yahoo.com">grp442@yahoo.com</A></DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://gloryrestoparts.20megsfree.com/">http://gloryrestoparts.20megsfree.com/</A></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=21260/*http://photos.yahoo.com">New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing</a>
- --0-338336691-1077921609=:48962--

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:41:23 +0000
From: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At 06:10 PM 2/27/2004 -0300, you wrote:
>Steve, there will be soon a perfect 260ci on sale,

Thank you very much, Matt; that's very kind of you.

But unfortunately, I'm not interested.  ;o\  ;o\  ;o\

SteveH

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:43:57 -0800
From: geo.aigel@netzero.net
Subject: 66 Cutlass rear 1/4 panels / sections available, hurry!

List:

An olds buddy has a 66 4 door cutlass supreme that will go to the scrapyard 
any time. There isn't much left but the rear quarters are rust free and 
pretty straight! Anyone need these quarters, or custom cut rust repair 
patch panels? I am sure they can be had cheap. Please write email. This is 
in the Bay Area, CA.

George

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:59:57 -0700
From: "Infinite Space Systems, Inc." <imp@theriver.com>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

> I figger you'd hafta be either a strict
> restorationist or a masochist to want to rebuild a 260 anyhow  ;o\
> Or else, you just enjoy having the sand kicked in yer eyes like
> the weakling on the beach  :o)))))))


It depends on the application. 40 years ago, Ford had a 260, which grew up
to be the 289. Even so, the 260 Fords were used quite a lot in road racing,
turning 10,000 to 12,000 RPM and winning races.

The first Cobras were 260s, along with the Sunbeam Tiger.

Milton Schick
1964 442 Cutlass
imp@theriver.com

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:34:15 -0800
From: geo.aigel@netzero.net
Subject: More 66 parts

I have the following 66 supreme parts:

330 intake to oil pan w/ manifolds 72k miles
air cleaner
4 door trunklid (does this fit the conv.?)
Dash and dashpad
Steering wheel

These parts are in the Bay Area, CA. I'd like to trade for cool 71 stuff 
(for my 442 and C/S) if you can. Otherwise make an offer.

George

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:02:52 -0500
From: Cutlass7276@netscape.net (Randy Hermsen)
Subject: Re: Non FI 371 comes to life AGAIN!

Hi Greg
I got her going a while ago,,,she really moves :)
I ran into Rob D. in Pittmeadows the otherday,he lives on Ford road...this was the fellow i told you had wagon prts....he seemed to know you now so i guess you got the door you needed from him?
What else has he got for prts?,,,how was the prices?
I will book a time with 58 at Missionraceway next April 9-10-11.
You can also catch me at the Java Hut(Langley) fri nights unless they close it down again this year?
Thanks!
Good luck!
Randy H.


Greg Tjosvold <tjosvold@polar7.com> wrote:

>Randy,
>
>Congrats on getting her going!
>
>'Best,
>
>Greg
>
>
>

__________________________________________________________________
Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service. 
Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need. 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:51:15 -0500
From: King V <king_v@mindless.com>
Subject: Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At 01:53 PM 02/27/2004 -0500, SteveH wrote:

>Never heard of anyone overboring a 260 so have no idea how thick 
>the cylinder walls really are. I figger you'd hafta be either a strict 
>restorationist or a masochist to want to rebuild a 260 anyhow  ;o\ 
>Or else, you just enjoy having the sand kicked in yer eyes like 
>the weakling on the beach  :o)))))))

Hey man . . I figure if engines like the 273 Mopar, the 289 Ford, and 283
Chevy could have had decent reputations back in the day, I'm sure SOMETHING
could be done with the 260!

Not that I've tried, mind you.  But maybe, just maybe, someday, I might.

	- Joe Vahabzadeh

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:52:41 -0500
From: King V <king_v@mindless.com>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At 02:20 PM 02/27/2004 -0300, Matt wrote:
>Thanks Cliff, I think that with those small bores there should be some more
>iron in the block making the 260 potentially a heavy engine. I never saw the
>wight numbers for this particuliar engine

Doesn't the 260 also have an aluminum intake, vs the iron intake on the 455?

	- Joe Vahabzadeh

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:23:28 +0000
From: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Subject: Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At 10:52 PM 2/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>At 02:20 PM 02/27/2004 -0300, Matt wrote:
>>Thanks Cliff, I think that with those small bores there should be some more
>>iron in the block making the 260 potentially a heavy engine. I never saw the
>>wight numbers for this particuliar engine
>
>Doesn't the 260 also have an aluminum intake, vs the iron intake on the 455?

Don't think so but not sure. Very few 260 owners have volunteered much info
bout their engines, mostly cause not many others are innerested in them.

SteveH

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:11:52 -0800
From: Kevin & Casey Olund <kcolund@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

> Hey man . . I figure if engines like the 273 Mopar, the 289 Ford, and 283
> Chevy could have had decent reputations back in the day, I'm sure SOMETHING
> could be done with the 260!

They can all go as fast as your wallet will handle.

Kevin 

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:23 -0800
From: geo.aigel@netzero.net
Subject: free carfax til sunday!

Free carfax until Sunday
In case anyone's interested

http://www.nbc4.com/consumer/2881475/detail.html

Click on carfax ad at bottom

It actually really works. I just checked our 17 digit vin cars. (you need 
that). If you want to do more than one car, you need to delete your 
cookies, otherwise they know you came back. :)

George

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:23:13 -0500
From: "Christopher Witt" <rocketscience442@hotmail.com>
Subject: More eBay fun-  Question for seller -- Item #2462917579

>From: "Jeff" <jsalinardi@comcast.net>
>To: <rocketscience442@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Question for seller -- Item #2462917579
>Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:18:23 -0500
>
>Stay away from my auctions a__hole.
==============================
[edited for family content by CBW]
Does anyone have any idea why this "jsalinardi@comcast.net" or " 
bigblockolds" feller is so ingracious?

I cannot imagine what I might have done to bring that on. I wrote back to 
ask him what his problem is exactly. That's the sort of behavior I have come 
to expect from Brand C people. Perhaps he has me confused with someone else. 
Perhaps he just does not like inquiries.

Chris Witt



>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <rocketscience442@hotmail.com>
>To: <jsalinardi@comcast.net>
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:50 PM
>Subject: Question for seller -- Item #2462917579
>
>
> > what's the part number on that NOS OP sending unit? cannot make it out 
>in
>the photo...
> > --------------------
> >
> >
> > Question from:           *the*rocketscientist
> > Title of item:           NOS 68-72 Oldsmobile 442 Rally Pack Temp 
>Sending
>Unit
> > Seller:                  bigblockolds
> > Starts:                  Feb-24-04 21:41:28 PST
> > Ends:                    Mar-02-04 21:41:28 PST
> > Price:                   Currently $45.20
> > To view the item, go to:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2462917579
> >
> >
> >
> > Visit eBay, The World's Online Marketplace TM at http://www.ebay.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click here for Special Offer! 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:44:48 -0500
From: King V <king_v@mindless.com>
Subject: Re: Building a 260?  Re: 260 versus 468 - weight

At 09:11 PM 02/27/2004 -0800, Kevin wrote:
>
>> Hey man . . I figure if engines like the 273 Mopar, the 289 Ford, and 283
>> Chevy could have had decent reputations back in the day, I'm sure SOMETHING
>> could be done with the 260!
>
>They can all go as fast as your wallet will handle.

(blows out dust and watches moths flutter from wallet....)

Well, there goes that idea for me!  ;)


	- Joe

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:22:47 EST
From: Gamble51@aol.com
Subject: Re: More eBay fun-  Question for seller -- Item #2462917579

- --part1_12f.3c3493ec.2d721a57_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Well done you idiot, just reported you to ebay

who's the a hole now

you muppet

- --part1_12f.3c3493ec.2d721a57_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT  SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=
=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
<BR>
Well done you idiot, just reported you to ebay<BR>
<BR>
who's the a hole now<BR>
<BR>
you muppet</FONT></HTML>

- --part1_12f.3c3493ec.2d721a57_boundary--

------------------------------

End of oldsmobile-digest V1 #4797
*********************************
